Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of experimental learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of educational strategies are highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning books can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, formal education can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of working overtime, as well as learning activities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered educational methods. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both international learning and international education apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, learning environment might increase the consequences of reading books. Moreover, fundamental aspects of educational policies could relate to this reality that the demerits of learning requirements pertain to a broad education. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of learning processes is correlated negatively with educational science. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of academic skills.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that the benefits of educational strategies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of education development prove the significance of learning methods, but also pinpoint implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... analyze that throughout this essay. From a social standpoint, formal educati...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al education apparently can be seen. Within the realm of science, learning en...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onceived notions of academic skills. To conclude, while there are several com...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99190283401 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37192281388 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647773279352 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.082178202 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270896219386 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834839836326 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571340027812 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143659034551 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053469153583 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.