Some people think that there must be fixed punishment for all types of crimes. Do you agree/disagree
Some people are inclined to believe that having a fixed punishment is the most productive way of handling prisoners. Personally, I disagree with that statement and truly believe that it will only bring detriment. In this essay, I will try to state my point of view with proper examples and arguments.
First of all, a fair penalty is directly proportional to the act that you committed, motive and scale. For instance, rapists and tax frauds cannot be put in the same equation under any circumstances due to their complete differences. Therefore, imposing the standardized penalty for everyone is totally inequitable.
Secondly, a single judgement on any kind of law break will bring society to total chaos. Knowing that committing a simple crime such as driving a car without a license will be equivalent to any other severe and brutal violation of the law, will bring fear into people's everyday lives. Thus, everyone will be afraid to do anything out of the box, which will eventually doom society
In conclusion, it is manifest that providing the same sentence is completely unfair and an absurd idea that will bring detriment to humanity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ll only bring detriment. In this essay, i will try to state my point of view with...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 1977.66487455 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 190.0 407.700716846 47% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03157894737 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 4.48103885553 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8060085906 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 212.727598566 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.668421052632 0.524837075471 127% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 618.680645161 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8254430103 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.222222222 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 5.45110844103 222% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163057702377 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611945453031 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050211137122 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780962737214 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475165856533 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.