TPO 46 - Question 6
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-15 | Valeria1949 | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-08-03 | minaaminaa33 | 100.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-08-08 | dshah6611 | 60.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-07-05 | hsi | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-01-17 | mgrajapt | 71.00 | Check this speaking |
- 1252 Describe an interesting country (not your own) you likeYou should sayWhat the Country isHow you know the CountryWhat you know about the CountryAnd explain why you think the Country is Interesting 80
- 893 what makes a friend into a good friend? 80
- TPO 31 - Question 3 70
- 742 how do people in your country feel about genetic research? 80
- 656 what kinds of article are you most interested in? 70
Comments
Hello.
Hello.
I have a question about this type of questions. i have listened other test takers and noticed that some people add details which were not said in the lecture. For instance, http://www.testbig.com/comment/56597
He added that someone has played for 10-15 years. My question is what is the purpose of this type of question? Should I paraphrase the lecture or try to convey the meaning as close as possible to the original?
We didn't get 'someone has
We didn't get 'someone has played for 10-15 years' in the speech. The purpose is to ask us paraphrasing the lecture but pick up only the main features. This is the pattern for Q6:
Introduction. something like 'The professor is talking about....'. (about two sentences in 10-15 seconds)
Example 1, blabla... about 20-25 seconds //Don't spend too much time on the first example
Example 2, blabla... about 20-25 seconds
Hello.
I just try to understand
21 in 30
reason one can be developed better.