Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
A growing number of people believe that pushing up the price of petrol can remain one of the most effective steps to deal with traffic congestions and environmental pollutions. I am totally in favour of this idea. This essay will support my opinion with examples and present two different measures to address the problems as mentioned.
On the one hand, proponents believe that raising the price of petroleum tend to deter the majority of drivers running their vehicles particularly the cars, which actually constitute nearly two-thirds of total automobiles, and also release a large proportion of toxic gases such as carbon dioxide, hydrocarbons in the atmospheres. While people are likely to be discouraged secondary to the high prices, at the same time, this type of change generally dooms people to choose alternative forms of transportations like riding bikes and taking foots. Therefore, this strategy proves that how overcrowding of carriers and environmental pollutions may be addressed effectively.
Apart from that, governments should levy taxes and build separate lanes for bikes so that the drivers would be compelled either to use public transportations such as electric trains, buses and so on or bicycles, which typically play crucial roles by decreasing the traffic congestions and its harmful emissions. In addition, if rulers improved infrastructures by building fly overs, bridges and respective lanes, the overcrowding issues would solve readily. And recently, an engine efficiency has been steadily improved with upgrade engine designs like placement of a catalytic converter in exhaust pumps of automobiles that would convert very dangerous gases namely nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide to less toxic gases. So, authorities ought to allocate some percentages of national budget to such technology to prevent pristine atmospheres from being contaminated by the exhaust gases.
To conclude, increasing prices, imposing fines and expanding roads make decisive steps to deal with traffic jams and surrounding pollutions.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
raising the price of petroleum tend to deter
raising the price of petroleum tends to deter
with upgrade engine designs
with upgraded engine designs
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.182 21.0 //sentences are a little bit long, for example:
On the one hand, proponents believe that raising the price of petroleum tend to deter the majority of drivers running their vehicles particularly the cars, which actually constitute nearly two-thirds of total automobiles, and also release a large proportion of toxic gases such as carbon dioxide, hydrocarbons in the atmospheres.
and also release is parallel to 'constitute' or 'tend'? is not clear
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 310 350
No. of Characters: 1698 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.196 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.477 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.957 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 132 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 104 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 74 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.182 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.1 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.326 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.586 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.021 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, while, apart from, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6064516129 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01184619159 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664516129032 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.9463622532 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.0 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0844137901034 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0309644415642 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297372290301 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0521037050172 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213683970047 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.