In this time of globalization, Many countries collaborate with other countries to exchange their students for a predefined period. Many academic professionals believe that such student exchange has myriad advantages and some think that there are disadvantages to that. I would try to discuss both of the views, although I strongly agree with the former group that has a more positive outlook towards foreign exchange than the negative one.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons that why it is beneficial to interchange students with other countries. And the foremost important one is to exchange of culture. For instance, through student exchange programs, those pupils will have exposure to foreign traditions, civilization, and day-to-day etiquette, which eventually broadens the perspective of those teenagers, and reciprocatively, the domestic children will also have fresh attitudes towards other cultures through interactions of these international students. Moreover, this does not only interchange the tradition but it builds sympathetic attachment towards foreign traditional values.
On the contrary, there is a portion of tutors who believes that such temporary foreign study would be nothing but a waste of key academic time. To put it in other words, when a young kid visits another country to study, he won’t have much time to adapt to their pedagogy and he might learn any academic concept, which might result in the loss of the curriculum in his home country as well. Moreover, at that age, many youngsters are not even able to adapt to new cultural values, which is the ultimate purpose of the concept of the student exchange program. So the program might become not only a waste of precious time but also a waste of the country’s monetary resources.
Considering the aforementioned points of view from both sides, I support the idea of academic exchange of students with the consideration of the maturity age of humans as well, which may fulfill the government’s vision to influx and interchange the tradition and culture of two countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33536585366 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99426255844 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557926829268 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.1437339266 49.4020404114 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.833333333 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193931826861 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737284534231 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744124973059 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115780553494 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696250050513 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.