In the present age, it is argued that cars which will be used in twenty years is less than now. In my opinion, I agree that there are now able to use cars more than the future in several locations in the world. However, I also believe that there will be different in other areas.
On the one hand, amount of using cars will be decrease in some developed countries be like Japan, America, Chinese…. In there, they have good public trasports and good transportation. So the traffic is not usually jam, public transport is always on time and fast. Then personal transports is become not really useful. The result is fewer people will use cars. Be side it, the intellectual of people is so important. Because the good traffic culture, such as yelding seat for old people, children, people with disabilities, … or being quiet in there,…, make public transports is more popular.
On the other hand, in undeveloped countries, the people use cars will be incease. In contrast to developed countries, the infrastructure in there is not high quality. Public traffic is unconvient. Therefore, most of the people have own transport: bicycle, motorbike, car, …. But these countries is still developing so cars will more used than the other transports. Espeacially Viet Nam, in the next several years, no riding old motorbikes – most popular transport in there. In that time, the most popular transport is cars.
In conclusion, it is clear that people will use cars less in the next twenty years is partly true. However, I hope that everybody around the world use public transports more to save energy and protect environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 332, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...become not really useful. The result is less people will use cars. Be side it, the i...
^^^^
Line 2, column 520, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...ople, children, people with disabilities,… or being quiet in there,…, make public ...
^^
Line 2, column 546, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...h disabilities,… or being quiet in there,…, make public transports is more popular...
^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ublic traffic is unconvient. Therefore, most of people have own transport: bicycle, motorbike,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...e own transport: bicycle, motorbike, car,…. But these countries is still developin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, still, then, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 273.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93772893773 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75009864805 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 212.727598566 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531135531136 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6481715103 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.9473684211 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3684210526 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292565407397 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964618484978 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107458099176 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213572812515 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939961503688 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.