The Article states that the dinosaurs are endotherms and provides some reasons to support the idea. However, the professor cast doubts on the points by saying that scientists thinks there are some problems about the idea and the reasons cannot prove it.
First, the author states that fossils of dinosaurs were found in polar regions, therefore they were endotherms and could maintain their body temprature constant in the cold environment. However, the professor believes that climate of the polar regions were warmer at the time of dinosaurs and warm enough for them to live there. Also, during the cold months they could migrate or hibernate like other reptiles.
Second, the passage posits that there was a connection between endothermy and the movements of legs in dinosaurs. However, the lecturer explains that does not necessary mean that dinosaurs were endotherms because they had their legs under their body. In contrary, the professor believes that the position of their legs supported mores weight of the dinosaurs. Therefore they could grow large. This is obvious that being large was an advantage for them.
Third, the passages mentins the Haversial canals and demonstrates that there iwas a connection between endothermy and bone structure. In this case, the professor says it is true that dinosaurs had the Haversian canals.However, she adds that they were not rapidly growing in the cold weather, but slowly. Their body structure helped them to grow rapidly when it was not cold.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...upported mores weight of the dinosaurs. Therefore they could grow large. This is obvious ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...that dinosaurs had the Haversian canals.However, she adds that they were not rapidly gr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, therefore, third, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21991701245 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52771691461 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551867219917 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1916055837 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7692307692 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162068217072 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565161708773 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544649916012 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094845732392 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396451231735 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.