tpo 49
The author of the reading passage claims that the way animals manage their migration is perplexed and intricate. For instance, there are several theories which show humpback whales use stars as navigational tools for their migration in long distances. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and present some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author holds the view that these whales are intelligent animals and they use their brain high well-developed cognitive ability to navigate by stars. In contrast, the lecturer underlines the idea that there is no connection between intelligent and navigation. Indeed, some birds also use this method to navigate long distances and they are not highly intelligent.
The author also asserts that humpback whales use straight lines for their navigation if they orient by some forces. Conversely, the professor brings up the idea that earth magnetite fields help animals to navigate. In fact, the brains of humpback whales are sensitive to these fields due to the presence of bio magnetite in their brains. So, this will provide an opportunity for the humpback whale to orient by magnetite field.
Finally, as set forth by the author these whales use an odd behavior called spy-hopping, which is very rare and provide some information for navigational purposes. Conversely, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that although it is a rare behavior, other animals like sharks use this behavior to hunt other animals. Also, this behavior has been seen during the day. So, hardly can humpback whales navigate by spy hopping behavior.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, well, for instance, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26459143969 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62691738329 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552529182879 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4511523245 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6428571429 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465514458405 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163407718807 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116561756252 0.0662205650399 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279933797136 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199959633635 0.0443174109184 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.