the below graph shows the average class size in six countries and compare it with the world average class size in 2006. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant.
The given graph demonstrates the average class size in six different countries such as South Korea, Japan, UK, Denmark, Mexico and Iceland, and compare that it with the average class size of the world in one specific year 2006. It shows class size of two category primary school(age 5-10) and lower secondary school(age 13-16)
We can get to know from the graph that in south Korea, Japan, Mexico and Iceland the average number of student in lower secondary school were more than that in primary school. In contrast, in UK and Denmark the scenario was reverse. Also, universal report shows that demand of primary school were little bit more than the lower secondary school in 2006.
The average class size of primary school in south Korea(34) was more than the average of world(26). All the other countries average were bellowed of the universal figure. For lower secondary school south Korea, Japan and Mexico had big size of classroom than world average(24) in year 2006. Remaining countries from the category had the average small size of classroom than the world average of it in the same year.
In conclusion, South Korea had average big size of classroom than any other countries had that in 2006.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...hows that demand of primary school were little bit more than the lower secondary school in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...average small size of classroom than the world average of it in the same year. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89705882353 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25099298862 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416666666667 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6107230885 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326054826532 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161303682858 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117091594755 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229802261802 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127678931488 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.