The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.
The pie chart enumerates the information regarding the amount of uk students who answer the question about managing finance and tabular chart depicts the percentage of people who organised from different age group.
it is vivid from the first chart, the highest proportion of the students who responded around 55℅ they were able to manage their finance fairly and 20℅ of the students were not maintain their performance to manage the finance Similarly, the lower 4% of pupils were not organised all their finance where as the 21% of students were better in organised their finance well.
Turning to the second chart, it is clearly seen from the second illustration the students who belongs from age group of over 36-year-old organised their finance well, where as the students who between 26 to 25 years manage their finance well but not considerable. the students who aged up to 26 years their performance of managing finance is very lower about 18%
Overall, it is clear that some of the student's answers are fairly organised. The number of students in the age group of over 36 years is very organised.
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and giv 73
- The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised. 61
- The chart below gives the information about three different crimes in England and Wales from 1970 to 2005. 67
- The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised. 61
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... organised from different age group. it is vivid from the first chart, the high...
^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'maintained'.
Suggestion: maintained
...fairly and 20℅ of the students were not maintain their performance to manage the finance...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ls were not organised all their finance where as the 21% of students were better in orga...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...-year-old organised their finance well, where as the students who between 26 to 25 years...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...heir finance well but not considerable. the students who aged up to 26 years their ...
^^^
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... about 18% Overall, it is clear that some of the students answers are fairly organised. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, similarly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55279129607 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.3735736872 43.030603864 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 187.0 112.824112599 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.4 22.9334400587 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 5.23603664747 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.094177254598 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697816430295 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0202839929668 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762833514411 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033550404577 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 13.2329268293 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.