The line graph illustrates the information about the count of books that were loaned from four different countryside libraries, while the pie graph elucidates the proportion of five various types of books that were rented in the year 2014.
It is evident from the line graph that 50 books were borrowed from two village libraries namely Sutton Wood and Church Mount in the month of June which were almost double in the next month. Additonally, 150 books were rented from West Eaton in August which remained same for next month as well as from Church Mount borrowed books reached to 150 after significant increase till month of September. However, the number of books loaned in June were 300 which decreased drastically and reached to 160 in September. Moreover, Books rented from Sutton Wood library were 250 in June which were increased in July with 20. On contrary, in the month of August number of books were declined rapidly remains only 100 books but there was again increase in September that is 300.
Moving towards pie graph, it is vivid from the graph that maximum books were borrowed of fiction with 43% which was followed by biography subject that is 19% and the same number of books were rented related to history and science. Moreover, only 10% books were loaned the type of self-help subject.
Overall, it can be said that maximum books were rented from Sutton Wood and Ryeslip liabraries. However, maximum reader were of fiction subject.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ollowed by biography subject that is 19% and the same number of books were rented...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 7.0 300% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92712550607 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30634949212 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477732793522 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4086385732 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.7 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425122203004 0.215688989381 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195214636672 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915773045817 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281599644307 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945437847947 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.