Super Screen Movie Production Company
Paraphrasing and restating what the author says, that there is a lack of advertisement and hence, there is a problem in the viewership. But there are a lot of loopholes in the claim which collectively fail to provide a viable solution.
First, there are no statistics as per the genre is concerned. It is not clear what kind of movies has Super Screen produced during the past year. For example, if the targeted audience craves comedy, there is no point in feeding them with horror genre. It might be the case that Super Screen has produced a genre specific movie which is not a good fit for its prospective audience.
Furthermore, there is no information about the reviews that were received. There is not any statistical information provided for the percentage increase. The percentage increase can be as low as one percent to as high as one thousand percent. If there is a reasonable amount of increase in the number of reviews, only then can we take out any conclusion out of this claim.
Thirdly, there is no juxtaposition between the advertisements done in the past year as compared to previous years. It is not a good idea to create a supposition out of the claim without actually looking into how advertisement has affected the targeted audience in the past years. There may be the case where all the money used for advertisement has gone in vain. It is unviable to create an assumption out of this point without knowing the statistics.
Also, there is no information about who has reviewed the movies. The paragraph simply mentions 'movie reviewers'. There can be a huge fan following which actually turns in positive reviews, or there can be critiques who belong to a particular group, somehow related to the production company. Additionally, there is no information about any system, which differentiates between the fake and real reviews.
So, there are a lot of loopholes which have to be addressed so as to answer the questions that arise from the claim. Without them, the author's claim is leaving a lot of loose ends questioning the coherence of the claim.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-taken-me…
----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 356 350
No. of Characters: 1675 1500
No. of Different Words: 170 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.344 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.705 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.814 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.169 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.65 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.304 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.581 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 61, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...of loopholes which have to be addressed so as to answer the questions that arise from th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, so, then, third, thirdly, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 356.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85674157303 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88780849203 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494382022472 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6540579408 57.8364921388 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.45 119.503703932 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 23.324526521 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.70786347227 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105831704955 0.218282227539 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325197959823 0.0743258471296 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761211190191 0.0701772020484 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0479188983152 0.128457276422 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815292560147 0.0628817314937 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.3550499002 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.197005988 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 98.500998004 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.