The chart below shows the percentage of men and women who did various free-time activities in England in 2006.
The given bar chart illustrates the figures for males and females doing different leisure activities measured in England in the year 2006.
It can clearly be seen that watching television reached the highest point in both genders in England in 2006.
Looking at the information in more detail, the percentage of men was higher than the percentage of women including doing sport or exercise, reading, using the internet and playing computer games. To specify, the proportion of males using the internet was nearly 75%, which was almost twice as high as that of females (about 37%). In addition, playing computer games was also a leisure activity having the percentage twice as much as that of women (approximately 10% and 5%, respectively).
Also, doing sport or exercise and reading had a fairly equal figure for men, which was around 75% while those for women were not far behind (roughly 70% in both activities).
Nevertheless, men outnumbered women by percentage when it comes to the rest of the categories. The most striking point is that the percentage of female population shopping totally dominated that in male residents (almost 75% and 30%, correspondingly). In contrast, a similar proportion of watching TV and spending time with friends was recorded between males and females, at about 80%-85% in both activities of both groups.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-20 | quynhan1995 | 78 | view |
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 61
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skill than people who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe in 2005, 2009 and 2015, compared with the European average. Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of men and women who did various free-time activities in England in 2006. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16513761468 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7893680334 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582568807339 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1371351256 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.111111111 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200793156448 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866183260635 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513817326502 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107344715388 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035944623298 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.