Some people think that the government should pay one of the parents of very young children to
stay at home to look after their children.What do you think would be the advantages and disadvantages of this policy?
In this fast and furious world, bringing up children is supposed to be the most challenging job for modern parents. Presently, it is argued that financial assistance should be given by administration for the one parent to take care of children by staying at home. Here, I would like to account for both pros and cons of this phenomenon with my opinion.
There are multifarious merits of this idea. First and foremost, supporting by money to parents can ensure the bright future of children. For example, one parent can not only prevent children from bad habits like joining bad company, taking drugs or smoking, watching television, playing computer games for long time but also nourish them with worthwhile etiquettes. Adding to it, exposure to a gaurdian to devote time with children will be lucrative for safety and sharpening interpersonal skills.On the contrary, its darker side can never be underestimated.
Firstly, financial crisis are likely to be witnessed by governments especially in thriving nations. To illustrate, managing money to shore up child rearing seems far cry for administration of a country like, India, where government do not have sufficient funds to fulfill very important needs of people such as education, transportation and employment. Therefore, this concept does not fully hold the water. In addition, a plethora of working fields may get deprived of handy contribution of those parents assigned for looking after offsprings.
From my notion, ''every sword has two edges''. earning money to manage astronomical outlays by both parents is need of hour. So, it is big question that how to take care children in absence of bread winner parents. Although given view holds some positives. However, It is advisable to make sure by government that they have surplus funds in account before thinking about implementing over it.
To recapitulate, governments need to think more rationally about areas to invest money according to the dire needs of people.
- The Internet provides us with information about life and cultures of different countries and some people say it is not necessary to visit these countries to learn about them To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion and 84
- Some people believe that no homework should be given to children. Others, however, say that extra work is needed after school for children and teenagers in order to succeed. Discuss both the views and give your opinion including reasons and relevant examp 95
- Some people think that governments should provide subsidies to farmers to produce cheap healthy food. Others think that governments should tax companies producing unhealthy foods. Give your own opinion and examples. 80
- Many of the problems young people now experience, like juvenile deliquency, arise from the fact rhat, many married women work and are not at home ro look after their children. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 80
- It is more important for school children to learn about their local history than the world history Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and examples 43
where government do not have sufficient funds
where governments do not have sufficient funds
it is big question that how to take care children in absence of bread winner parents.
it is a big question on how to take care children in absence of bread winner parents.
For example, one parent can not only prevent children from bad habits like joining bad company, taking drugs or smoking, watching television, playing computer games for long time but also nourish them with worthwhile etiquettes.
Description: Not only...but also is not used properly.
Sentence: Adding to it, exposure to a gaurdian to devote time with children will be lucrative for safety and sharpening interpersonal skills.On the contrary, its darker side can never be underestimated.
Error: gaurdian Suggestion: guardian
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.038 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 319 350
No. of Characters: 1615 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.226 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.063 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.812 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 118 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.938 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.024 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.562 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.28 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.541 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.038 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5