Whether or not some people think government should pay one parent of young children to stay at home to look after their children is widely debated, with many people saying government should not pay one parent of young children to stay at home to look after their children. in my opinion this notion merit serious consideration and I will explain why in this essay with pertinent argument and examples.
There are myriad of argument supporting my stance. The most conspicuous one is that we live in a word where children are influence by what see and what there are offer by their peers.
Another pivotal aspect of my argument is that charity begins at home not outside. The up bringing of young ones begin from the wound of the mother and if not well taken care of it could be detrimental to the family and the entire society.
For instance, underpinning the aforementioned, an empirical is that do we expect children to grow up and discipline to be impacted on kids by school teacher?
In view of the argument outlined above, one can conclude that the impact/benefit of parent not staying at home in these busy wold could cause harm for the children in future.
Nevertheless, the danger of both parent working to keep the house bills to date should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not some people think government should pay...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...y at home to look after their children. in my opinion this notion merit serious co...
^^
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'offers'?
Suggestion: offers
...nfluence by what see and what there are offer by their peers. Another pivotal aspe...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...tance, underpinning the aforementioned, an empirical is that do we expect children to grow u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... wold could cause harm for the children in future. Nevertheless, the danger of both ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cause harm for the children in future. Nevertheless, the danger of both parent ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 223.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7130044843 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64103861397 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565022421525 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 506.74238477 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7552621785 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.777777778 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455648721059 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135010713072 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162371417009 0.0667982634062 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174872159727 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155388791662 0.056905535591 273% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.