Over the past few daces people live without technology. But, in this modern era some people believe they can't live without technology. Whether technology has made the world better to live or not is widely debated with many people claiming that technology has made the world a better place to live.
In my opinion this notion merit serious consideration and I will explain why in this essay with pertinent argument and example. There are myriad of argument in support of my stance the most conspicuous one is that technology has reduce family bond and love for one another in the family. Today, many family no longer spend quality time together. Rather, they are always busy with their friends on social media thereby ignoring their family members.
Another pivotal aspect of my argument is that technology has made people to become lazy all over the world. Although technology has made academic work easier for student. People today no longer see the importance of reading knowing that when we read we exercise our brain.
For instance underpinning the aforementioned, an empirical is that what will happened in a wold where people can't spell and read properly? So many organisation are complaining about the poor performance of their staff reading and spelling level, as a result of excessive computer usage.
In view of the argument outline above, one can conclude that the impacts of technology are indeed too great to Ignored. Nevertheless, the benefit of technology should not be overlooked as either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...his modern era some people believe they cant live without technology. Whether techno...
^^^^
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
... conspicuous one is that technology has reduce family bond and love for one another in...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun family seems to be countable; consider using: 'many families'.
Suggestion: many families
...e for one another in the family. Today, many family no longer spend quality time together. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...stance underpinning the aforementioned, an empirical is that what will happened in a wold wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'happen'
Suggestion: happen
...ntioned, an empirical is that what will happened in a wold where people cant spell and r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...at will happened in a wold where people cant spell and read properly? So many organi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun organisation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many organisations'.
Suggestion: many organisations
...people cant spell and read properly? So many organisation are complaining about the poor performa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, nevertheless, so, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 249.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06827309237 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63027988707 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598393574297 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8401354088 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1428571429 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183800699125 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603969159725 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888712889641 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913899696456 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818735533621 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.