Our global diaspora is broadly segregated into two halves, oriental and occidental. There are bound to be differences on social, economical and cultural front as well. Therefore, the issue of some country encouraging teenagers to have part-time job and others discouraging it is of no exception and irrefutable. This essay is going to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of teenagers having part-time jobs with pertinent argument and examples.
In other to justify the view point part-time job helps the overall development of a person. To be able to learn how to manage finance and be prudent about spending. The main purpose of working is to prevent teenagers from committing crime.
Another, pivotal aspect of my discussion is that focusing too much on job can lead to lack of education. And education is the key to better opportunity. However, some country believed that teenager should be care for by their parent and the government. Although, they forgot that parent cannot provide modern teens with the kind of luxury lives they want to live. I personally opined that since childhood whatever, a child learns is mostly from school education hence it is more important to focus more on it than part-time job.
Although, the situation seems dire, but there are severe steps we can take to make tangible changes. Firstly, government should encourage teens on the important of education. Secondly, government should set limited hours per week for teens to work in other for them to focus more on their future.
To conclude, I would like to say that although part-time job is highly beneficial but we must be prudent to strike a balance, logical and rational approach towards the same for the optimal and fruitful outcomes of effort or utilization of resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cared'?
Suggestion: cared
...ountry believed that teenager should be care for by their parent and the government....
^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...for by their parent and the government. Although, they forgot that parent cannot provide...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09278350515 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77925516622 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615120274914 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.280015598 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.625 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217298948418 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678431196898 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919387327943 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116266124683 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789064065894 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.