The argument whether government waste too much on space exploration and research is not settle. With many people claiming that money spent on space and research is better for humans. In my opinion this notion merit serious consideration and I will explain why with pertinent argument ant examples. Ultimately, I think government are wasting too much money on space exploration and research.
There are myriad of argument in favor of my stance. The most conspicuous one is the advantages associated with spending less on space exploration and research. Firstly, the rate of poverty all over the world has increase significantly to eighty percent around the world. Investing more on company development will open way for employment and reduce the level of poverty. Although, exploring space will also pave way for more jobs and advance technology.
Another, pivotal aspect of my argument is high percentage of illiterate around the world. According to a survey conducted, it shows that 83.6% of people around the world are illiterate and as a result there is increase in the rate of crime because no company will want unskilled workers. Government can invest more on education and make it affordable for all.
For instance underpinning the aforementioned, an empirical is that in Albania the level of illiterate is 97% with only 3% of people educated. So why should government spend more on space exploration and research when so many people cannot afford three square meal? Why should government waste money on space and research when there are lots of bad roads, criminals, poverty and homeless people?
On the other hand the advantages of spending more on earth are too great to be ignored. Nevertheless, the importance of exploring space should not be overlooked as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...stance underpinning the aforementioned, an empirical is that in Albania the level of illiter...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, i think, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15224913495 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84399176735 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519031141869 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7135754063 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5882352941 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281422085048 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10358036842 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109803127901 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159693221379 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11909762709 0.056905535591 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.