Our global diaspora is broadly segregated into two halves oriental and occidental. So, there are bound to be difference on social, economical and cultural front as well. Therefore, the issue of a rise in the standard of living in a country that only benefits cites rather than rural areas is no exception and irrefutable. Ultimately, I opine that this rise in the standard of living is more beneficial to urban ares than rural areas and has problems associated with this. I will explain why with pertinent argument and examples. The most conspicuous one is underdevelopment in rural areas which comes with great effect on young growing young. This underdevelopment can lead to lack of jobs for youth.
Furthermore, underpinning the aforementioned an empirical part of the argument is that, if youth are unemployed they can seek alternative means of wealth. Such means can be sealing, prostitution, drugs and lack of self control.
Another, pivotal aspect in favor of my stance is lack of education. Today, education is the key ingredient to career prospect. With good education youth can fed for themselves, their family and their loved ones.
Although, the situation seems dire, there are several steps we can take to make real tangible changes. Firstly, Federal and state government should joint task force together in other to close the gap between urban and rural development. Secondly, if ten schools are build in a given region in urban areas according to the population, that proportion should also be consider for rural areas as well.
In conclusion, I would like to say that everything has its pros and cons. we must be vigilant enough to eliminate the cons and this is only possible if we can have the right perception and perspective towards the issue of rise in standard of living in cities than in rural areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd examples. The most conspicuous one is underdevelopment in rural areas which co...
^^
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are unemployed they can seek alternative means of wealth. Such means can be seali...
^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... that everything has its pros and cons. we must be vigilant enough to eliminate th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8593660487 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596721311475 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6162885037 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7058823529 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239308393724 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606099347079 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932936016013 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105758574979 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103144607149 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.