Our global diaspora is broadly segregated into two halves, oriental and occidental. there are bound to be difference on social, economical and cultural front as well. therefore the issue of environmental damage is of no exception and is irrefutable. This essay is going to explain why government and individual can make a change to environmental damage with pertinent argument and examples.
In other to justify the view point, the world we live in today has a lot of factories with production of different product taking place every hour throughout the year. This productivity causes toxic to our environment. We should not forget that without factories and production of materials for human consumption humans will still be living in ancient world. Although, each individual have a role to play on this. Today many people disposed of drink can on the street without using the appropriate method to recycle this can as provided by each community council.
Another, pivotal aspect of my discussion is that the state and federal government can implement a law that will affect those caught disposing of waste in the environment. This can be punish or an infringement to be given to prevent humans from completing damaging the environment. It is the duty of work health and safety to make sure that this toxic does not damage our environment. They have the powers to implement a law that can change the entire environment.
Although, the situation seems dire, but there are severe steps we can take to make tangible changes. Firstly, federal and state government should implement a law that will prevent people from damaging the environment. Secondly, factories should be design to prevent it from polluting the air. Pollution can result to one form of disease or the other.
To conclude, everything has its own pro and cons. But we must be vigilant to eliminate the cons and this is only possible if we can have the right perception and perspective towards our environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...to two halves, oriental and occidental. there are bound to be difference on social, e...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... economical and cultural front as well. therefore the issue of environmental damage is of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
... economical and cultural front as well. therefore the issue of environmental damage is of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 360, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... will still be living in ancient world. Although, each individual have a role to play on...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'designed'?
Suggestion: designed
...ironment. Secondly, factories should be design to prevent it from polluting the air. P...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 6.10837438424 262% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 5.75862068966 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 327.0 242.827586207 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05198776758 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86113370791 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544342507645 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6551724138 150% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7600045168 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9473684211 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2105263158 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63157894737 7.25397266985 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219340296041 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701990172335 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579857630598 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12880830128 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444294763256 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.