The topic that both the reading and the lecture discuss is the encouragement of the certification for the ecologically friendly products. Although the lecture show support of this outgrowing concept, the reading disagree with all the three benefits behind it.
First, the reading explains how the people in the united states do not pay much attention to the advertisements of the considered to be costly products. They do not even value them. However, the professor in the lecture claims that the united state citizen has a good sense of distinguishing between the commercials. They do not treat all the advertisement the same and they will value the eco-certified items for their value and they will encourage the national products like, for example, of the wood companies that have been mentioned.
Secondly, the reading states that the products from the certified wood companies would be more expensive than the uncertified ones. This, according to the reading will deter the consumers from buying them. On the other hand, the professor argues that the difference would not be of a much issue especially if it was not that high in comparable to the cuncertified one. He mentions that if the difference is by five percent, for instance, this will not affect the value of it.
Lastly, the reading refutes that it is a convinsing idea. It says that this would be a sense of importing the products abroad to keep up with the developement that happens abroad instead of selling their products in the national markets. But the professor in the lectrure said thgat this will increase the sencse of the competition, not only pay attention to the consumer itself. Falling behind the pace of the world wide development will make the united state an open market for the world by offering their products inside the states which will affect badly on the national wood product of the domestic companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
...ues that the difference would not be of a much issue especially if it was not that hig...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 411, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
... itself. Falling behind the pace of the world wide development will make the united state ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 411, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
... itself. Falling behind the pace of the world wide development will make the united state ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98107255521 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73979076622 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485804416404 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1672780861 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.