The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Overall, it is clear that among ten countries, China was the highest country that producing and consuming electricity in 2014, while Korea Republic was the lowest for both utilization and usage of electricity in 2014. However, Germany was the only country that consumed electricity more than produced it in 2014.

China was the most country that utilized and used electricity in 2014, at 5398 billion kWh and 5322 billion kWh, respectively. Following China was United States that produced 4099 billion kWh while used 3866 billion kWh. After United States was Russia, which the number of consumption and production were 1057 billion kWh and 1038 billion kWh, respectively. Those numbers did not even reach a half of United States' production and usage amount. The next was Japan, that generated 936.2 billion kWh electricity and used 856.7 billion kWh electricity. India came after Japan, with the amount of electricity production was 871 billion kWh and usage number was 698.8 billion kWh. Furthermore, Canada was in the position after India, generated 618.9 billion kWh and consumed 499.9 billion kWh.

On the 7th and 8th places were France and Brazil, that had similar amount of electricity production and consumption (561.2 billion kWh electricity production and 462.9 electricity usage for France, and 530.7 billion kWh electricity generation
and 455.8 electricity consumption for Brazil). Then, Germany people produced slightly different amount of electricity from France, at 530.7 billion kWh. However, Germany was the only country that used electricity more than produced it, at 582.5 billion kWh. At the last place was Korea Republic, which produced and consumed electricity at almost equal number, 485.1 billion kWh and 449 billion kWh.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...530.7 billion kWh electricity generation and 455.8 electricity consumption for Br...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 965.302439024 153% => OK
No of words: 273.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42124542125 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64377019759 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432234432234 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 145.91243093 43.030603864 339% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 185.0 112.824112599 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.125 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117144428915 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076009207776 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414771349674 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112848775486 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390882302144 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 13.2329268293 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.