TPO 33
The reading and the lecture are both about carved stone balls. In the reading states that Archaeologist's belief about carved stone balls's purposed and meanings , and represents several theories about that. On the other hand, Professor opposed these theories by saying that theories are not convincing.
First, the author claims that one theory about how carved stone balls used is as weapons in hunting or fighting. The lecture opposed this theory by points that arrows are used in Neolitic period. Also, there isn't any crack pieces and surfaces of stone balls are well preserved.
Second, in the reading states that carved stone balls were part of primitice system of weights and measure. Because they are nearly uniform , they represent standard measuring tolls. The professor refutes this theory by saying that, carved stone balls were massive uniform weight. Althought. they are in the same size, their weights might be different from each other. they have diffierent density.
Third, the author claims that carved stone balls might have been use to represent social statu. On the other hand the lecture counters this theory by points that some stone has extremely simple look to marked as status. Also, considering that people, who have important status, were burried with their positions at that time in Britain, No one have never found any carved stone balls.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...arved stone ballss purposed and meanings , and represents several theories about t...
^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cture opposed this theory by points that arrows are used in Neolitic period. Also...
^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...re used in Neolitic period. Also, there isnt any crack pieces and surfaces of stone ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...measure. Because they are nearly uniform , they represent standard measuring toll...
^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they are nearly uniform , they represent standard measuring tolls. The professor ...
^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...were massive uniform weight. Althought. they are in the same size, their weights mig...
^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...hts might be different from each other. they have diffierent density. Third, the ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...that carved stone balls might have been use to represent social statu. On the other...
^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...that carved stone balls might have been use to represent social statu. On the other...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, third, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21719457014 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20574932598 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556561085973 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4349427347 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3571428571 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7857142857 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.565189973974 0.272083759551 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19821596966 0.0996497079465 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903376203584 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.347002439028 0.162205337803 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858254148955 0.0443174109184 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.