Given are two figures concerning the number of the 3D movie theater and the 3D movie released per year. Overall, the popularity of the 3D screens growths, especially in the period 2008-2010. In the same period, the appearance of live-action film rapidly outnumbered the number of animated movies.
As it can be deduced from the line graphs, the 3D screens slowly increased worldwide between 2005 and 2008, moving from 0 to approximately 2000 units. The number of 3d animated films released, meanwhile, remained constant at less than three releases per year.
This trend, however, experienced an abrupt change in 2008, when the first 3D live-action films were produced. In the following period, the number of 3D screens exhibits a rapid soar, reaching in 2010 more than 15 times the amount of 3D cinema in 2008. At the same time, 3D live-action and 3D animated movies both rose their releases. In 3 years, the former surpassed the latter, and in 2011 more than 25 live-action films were produced, while 3D animated ones stoped at 21. The next year the positive trend continued for both the category, though the first showed a more significant growth than the second.
To conclude, in the same period 3D screens suddenly rose as well as 3D live-actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... years, the former surpassed the latter, and in 2011 more than 25 live-action fil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98578199052 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69950875973 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568720379147 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4337469447 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.6363636364 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130663811163 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611132791931 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294537408104 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914287879234 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122583308969 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.