1. Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
It is sometimes argued that whether people should pay entry fee to visit museums. To be honest, while I have to admit that there are some advantages of charging people for admission to museums, the advantages by no means outweigh the disadvantages and it is unnecessary.
To begin with, charging visitors for the museum tickets can surely subsidy museums and improve their environment and services. This is because the museums would have more budget to repair and maintain cultural and historical artifacts. The Winter Palace Museum in Russia, for example, charges everyone who wants to enter for the fabulous paintings collected inside the palace so that it has money to buy or rent more precious collections. Since there would be more valuable things in museums to see, more people are willing to pay for admission to museums like the Winter Palace Museum.
On the other hand, many critics argue that expensive tickets cost would stop visitors to museums and negatively affect the influence of them. This is because if the visitors to museums decrease dramatically, chances to promote local cultural heritage would drop correspondingly. According to recent surveys from Oxford University, most tourists would not go to museums if they have to pay for tickets. In addition, many museums do not have to charge visitors to keep running because they usually have subsidies from the state government. It is therefore clear that charging people for admission a museum is not a wise policy.
In conclusion, it may benefit museums financially for charging tickets, but in the long term, this would have some serious impacts on local cultural transmission.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23507462687 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.723121444 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6268802137 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.916666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453973709448 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178344659914 0.084324248473 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116930753555 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268668052704 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645793267151 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.