Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
Nowadays, most people countries over the world purchase the same product; because of the global spread. I believe that this globalization has a double-edge.
It is unquestionable that there are several benefits to global products. The first one is people can use equal conditions all over the world. This phenomenon conjures to progress in society. They could use new technology to improve their lifestyle. For instance, most people even in remote areas access a cell phone that could be used in an emergency. In addition, this trend has an undeniable effect on mass-produced for some famous brand, bring them economic progress on a global scale.
On the other hand, this issue causes some cultural and local businesses problem for each country. A good illustration of this Saree, Indian traditional clothes with a majority of women used to wear. Consumerism and easy access to Western clothing and products prevalence, resulting in the type of clothing Indian women select to wear. Although, this inclination has an effect on industry handicraft every region, I believe that this item showing the identity and culture of every nation.Status quo causing demolition in local trades. In the above example, we can observe, it is not only affecting shutting down many stores and productions but also result in the unemployment rate.
In conclusion, using existing popular products is an unavoidable problem. In my way of thinking, this trend is had strengths and weaknesses in culture, lifestyle, and economy. However, the government would find a beneficial solution to handle negative effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'businesses'' or 'business's'?
Suggestion: businesses'; business's
...is issue causes some cultural and local businesses problem for each country. A good illust...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 488, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Status
...he identity and culture of every nation.Status quo causing demolition in local trades....
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 75, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lar products is an unavoidable problem. In my way of thinking, this trend is had s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34782608696 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92368845706 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640316205534 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6207521936 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5625 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142557901382 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459897530691 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509542998799 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100659672983 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623955367138 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.