The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
The bar chart give information about the proportion of British people consuming the required fruit and vegetables quantity daily in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
Overall, the highest percentage in all the way was possessed by women sector, followed by men sector, while the figure of children took a minor proportion in the chart in the years surveyed. Another interesting point is that the year 2002, 2006 and 2010 shared the similar pattern regarding ranking among three groups of population and the difference between two of them.
The rate of British women digesting the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 was a quarter, being highest as compared with men and children groups, followed by increasing to reach a highest point in the chart of 32%, before dropping back to 27% in the last year examined. In addition, the figure of men had a similar fluctuation trend as that of women with the gap between the latter and the former being around 3%, ranking second - positioned in all three years. Meanwhile, the children sector hold the smallest proportion in the chart with being 11% in the first year, followed by increasing by 5% to hit a peak at 16% in 2006, before declining slightly to 14% in the last year surveyed, being a half of the figure of women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...groups, followed by increasing to reach a highest point in the chart of 32%, befo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84545454545 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56746563232 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518181818182 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7920758594 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.666666667 112.824112599 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.6666666667 22.9334400587 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226265415876 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121608446942 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107006429782 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1897920954 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943173204916 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.2329268293 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.