Summarize the points made in the lecture, be sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the passage.
The article states that cause and decline of sea otter from California to Alaska is by majorly by pollution and provides three reasons for the support. However, the professor explains that sea utter poulations has been declined by predation rather than pollution and refutes each of the author's reason.
To begin with, the reading claims that oil rigs and the industrial chemicals have caused the pollution. The article mentions water samples on those area revealed the increase of pollution thereby causing the deaths of otter. The professor refutes this point stating that no one has washed across the beaches. Instead, the number of sea utter are declining by predation.
Second, the reading states that other sea mammals other than utter were also declining due to the pollution. The mammals like seals and sea lions were also declining. However the professor says after predation has caused the whales to dimish for predating, the predators are hunting sea otter and other mammals.
Third, the reading says that there was a uneven parttern of otter decline.In some places, the otter population was stable while the other place was declining due to pollution. The professor refutes this point by saying that the population of otter was stable where the sea was sallow and rocky, thus difficult to hunt by predators.
|2020-01-07||itzavid||3||Read full essay|
- All college and university students would benefit from spending at least one semester studying in a foreign country.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people forleadership in government, industry, or other fields is byinstilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which youagree or disagree w50
- "Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different construction companies — Alpha and Zeta. Although the two buildings had identical floor plans, the buil53
- The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: THIS_NNS
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'those areas'?
Suggestion: this area; those areas
.... The article mentions water samples on those area revealed the increase of pollution ther...
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...eals and sea lions were also declining. However the professor says after predation has ...
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
... Third, the reading says that there was a uneven parttern of otter decline.In som...
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
... was a uneven parttern of otter decline.In some places, the otter population was s...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, third, thus, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40076987395 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1863633658 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.636363636 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0334119264066 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0154569012696 0.0996497079465 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275101515569 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0221046870526 0.162205337803 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145940740697 0.0443174109184 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.