The chart shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members in all faculties of a major university in 2012.
The bar graph illustrate the number of men and women education staff members in all faculties at a major tertiary institution in 2012.
Overall, engineering and education were the major faculties dominated by male and female . Few women were part of engineering, as the least number of men were part of education department. While, engineering was male dominated and education had a highest number of females in the faculty.
Regards to engineering, it was male dominated with almost 82% , whilst the least number was of women at around 19%. Education was second highest with lots of women than men, at above 60% and about 22% respectively. It is noticeable, medicine had an insignificant difference between men and women in the department, at almost 50% and 49% respectively.
The number of men in business studies faculty almost doubled the number of females in the same department at about 68% and 38%respectively. Only 3 faculties are female dominated, with insignificant difference, except for education with a huge gap of more than 100%. Other departments are male dominated with a large difference.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r faculties dominated by male and female . Few women were part of engineering, as ...
^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ng was male dominated and education had a highest number of females in the facult...
^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g, it was male dominated with almost 82% , whilst the least number was of women at...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25139664804 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11599271175 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519553072626 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4991489208 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162061208218 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819926793105 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889351581649 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128840408444 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089135639597 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.