The line graph illustrate changes in average pricing of navigation system and smartphone for a certain country. It shows the pricing in united states dollars for a period of 6 months in 2004 and the whole year 2005 and 2006 as each year is into two halves.
A distinguishing feature is the pricing of navigation system as it fell drastically upon which it rose only once and continue to decline further, whereas smartphone price decrease, rose again and remained constant until the end of the lastyear of the given period.
It is noticeable as illustrated on the graph that beginning of of the last 6months of 2004 price of navigation system was high which was about 3800 united states dollars, however, in 2005 it decreased throughout the year. Further, into first halves of the year, it rose sharply to about 3500 united states dollars and decline again to almost 2700 united states dollars at the last 6months of the year 2006.
The smartphone price was 3100 last halves of 2005 as highlighted on the line graph. It began to fall moving into first 6 months of 2005 and fluctuated again to 3000 united states dollars on the last 6 months of the same year. Moving further into the following year it declined again to 2600 united states dollars and it remained constance till year the end of the year 2006.
To sumup, prices for navigation system decreased drastically and rose only once as it continue to decline, whilst smartphone prices was changing intermittently throughout the given period
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...illustrated on the graph that beginning of of the last 6months of 2004 price of navig...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ited states dollars, however, in 2005 it decreased throughout the year. Further, ...
^^
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...phone price was 3100 last halves of 2005 as highlighted on the line graph. It beg...
^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Moving further into the following year it declined again to 2600 united states ...
^^
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... navigation system decreased drastically and rose only once as it continue to dec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86770428016 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57212865375 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.412451361868 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.3763682458 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0897547770095 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053754969634 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427262793491 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656915046418 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322501907658 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.