The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak

The pie chart illustrate the main cause of worldwide land degradation during the 1990s as a percentage which resulted in unproductivity of the land, while the table highlight three regions which were affected by degradation percentagewise.

Three main causes of land degradation shown on both chart and table are overgrazing, deforestation and overcultivation. The most popular cause of degradation worldwide was due to overgrazing which affected 35percent of total land. Deforestation was the second as it affected 30percent with a differential of 5percent from overgrazing. Overcultivation was two percent less from deforestation. Other factors not mentioned contributed 7percent of degradation.

The table shows three regions which are North America, Europe, Oceania.These three regions were affected by overgrazing, overcultivation and deforestation. Deforestation was less significant in North America as it affected Europe significantly at 9.8percent. No land was affected in Oceania by overcultivation, hence 7,7percent was experienced in Europe. Morever, overgrazing was the most cause of degradation in Oceania as it was 11.3percent, 5.5percent in Europe and 1.5percent in North America.Additionally, North America was least affected by degradation which was 5percent, whilst Europe was 23percent highly affected, furthermore Oceania's total degraded land was 10percent less of Europe.

To sumup, the major cause of land degradation worldwide and in the three mentioned regions was overgrazing, followed by deforestation and lastly overcultivation as shown on both pie chart and table

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctors not mentioned contributed 7percent of degradation. The table shows three...
^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
...hich are North America, Europe, Oceania.These three regions were affected by overgraz...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Additionally
... Europe and 1.5percent in North America.Additionally, North America was least affected by de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, second, while, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 3.97073170732 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05726872247 4.92477711251 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.75282307523 2.65546596893 141% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458149779736 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.6736103379 43.030603864 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206760781323 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101743916474 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857600704754 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169309961498 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577602426198 0.0819641961636 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 61.2550243902 42% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 11.4140731707 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.