The line graph illustrate number of various items which were recycled as a percentage from 1982 to 2010 in a certain country.
Overal, paper and cardboard, as well as glass containers were the most recycled items from beginning of the given period, while averagely reused material was aluminium cans. The least recycled item was plastics. Recycling of aluminium cans began later in 1984, as of plastics was introduced 4 years later.
Highlighted on the graph, recycling of paper and cardboard began in 1982 at 65 percent. It increased steadily until it reached 70 percent in 1984 and experience a fall again in 1988, which was followed by a sharp fluctuation of more than 10 percent in 1992. A period of gradual fall was seen from 1992 upto 2010, with a total decline of 10 percent. Glass containers was at 50 percent in 1982 and trough of 10 percent was experienced in 1988, as it was followed by sharp rise of 10 percent in 1992 and continued to increase steadily upto 2010.
Reuseable material of aluminium cans was introduced later in 1984 and continued to rise steadily until 2008 as it reached it's peak of 42 percent. Four years later, recycling of plastics was introduced and it moved at a slower rate, even failed to reach 10 percent for the whole period.
Similarly, aluminium cans and plastics were at a rate below 10 percent at the beginning of the survey. Paper and cardboard peaked in 1992 as it had a proportion of 80 percent, while glass containers reached its highest point in 2008, at 60 percent. Likewise, paper and cardboard, as well as glass containers reached it's dip in 1988, as they both had a rate of 67 percent and 40 percent respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...percent in 1982 and trough of 10 percent was experienced in 1988, as it was follo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, similarly, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 292.0 196.424390244 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74315068493 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66165079773 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448630136986 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.07073170732 654% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6428886788 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.538461538 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152800273799 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750843966911 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688163362772 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115678617495 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078544694722 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.