The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country
The chart shows the percentage of paper and cardboard , glass containers , aluminium cans and plastics that were recycled in one country between 1992 and 2010
In 1922 in 1982 about 65 percentage of paper and cardboard was recycled . The figure fluctuated before rising steeply reach peak of 80% in 1994. From then on, however it decreased steadily to a level of 70% in 2010
In 1982, half of all glass container were recycled after dipping to a lot of 40% in 1990 , the glass recycling rate gradually increase to 60% by 2010. Aluminium cans what is first recycled in 1986, starting at about 5%, but this figured claimed rapidly over 25 year and by 2010 it has reached 45%. Recycling of plastics on the other hand was not interested until 1990 and although the growth in which category was also can constant , it was very slow rising from about 2% to around 8% over the period
Overall the proportion of paper and cardboard that was his cycle was the highest of the four classes of material but this category expressed a decline after 1994 where as there was a continuing upward trend in the recycling of the Other material
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ws the percentage of paper and cardboard , glass containers , aluminium cans and p...
^^
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f paper and cardboard , glass containers , aluminium cans and plastics that were r...
^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tage of paper and cardboard was recycled . The figure fluctuated before rising ste...
^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ed after dipping to a lot of 40% in 1990 , the glass recycling rate gradually incr...
^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'canned'.
Suggestion: canned
...h the growth in which category was also can constant , it was very slow rising from...
^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... in which category was also can constant , it was very slow rising from about 2% t...
^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...category expressed a decline after 1994 where as there was a continuing upward trend in ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69849246231 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41826697998 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597989949749 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 127.629150275 43.030603864 297% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 187.0 112.824112599 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.8 22.9334400587 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 5.23603664747 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243152362602 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114346498473 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756886356841 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148210972351 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029544760505 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.2329268293 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.