The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods.
The table illustrate the number of people who visited Ashdown Museum before and after renovation, while the two pie charts display customer's satisfaction pre and post refurbishment.
Overall, there was an increase in number of people who visited the museum post renovations. It is noticeable, the number of subjects who did not respond to the survey remained unchanged, whilst, a general increase was witnessed for visitors satisfied, as those dissatisfied reduced significantly after refurbishment.
It can clearly be seen that, after improvements to the museum, majority of people visited from 74.000 to 92.000 post renovations. The number of people who did not respond to the survey remained stagnant pre and post renovations, at 5%. A major rise was experienced from above one tenth to around a third of those who were very satisfied. Significantly, the subjects satisfied increased by exactly 10% from 30% to 40% post improvements.
However, a general decrease witnessed for visitors who were dissatisfied after improvements. There was a huge reduction in number of people who were dissatisfied post renovations from 40% to 15%, as well as, 50% fall for those very dissatisfied after refurbishment from 10% to 5%. Generally, there was a decreased in number of visitors to the museum before improvements, reduced client satisfaction, as well as, customer dissatisfaction. Whilst post improvements, a rise in number of people who visited the museum was experienced post renovation and client satisfaction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
The table illustrate the number of people who visited Ashdow...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, third, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51282051282 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3201910546 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470085470085 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 390.6 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.172917743 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.272727273 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165149825631 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081373342624 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441328692173 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125465277502 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353483165117 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.