The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by a car.
The two pie charts illustrate two mode od transport used by people to travel to work and the reason for preferred transport system.
Overall, people choose two types of transport, either, cycling or driving to work. An equal number of people cycle for health and fitness, as well as, for environmental concern like pollution, while few people agree that it is faster than driving in terms of congestion. The second chart shows that majority of people drive for their comfort, whilst the least number consider driving safer than cycling.
According to the fist chart, majority of people, which is one-third of the population cycle to work, similarly, for health and fitness, as well as fighting pollution from gas emission by cars. Few people believe that cycling is faster the driving, at 12%. 15% of the people who cycle highlight the problem with parking space for the car, hence, they prefer cycling. The number of people who cycle to work is half of those who cycle for fitness and health, as well as, to fight pollution.
Conversely, the second chart highlight, 40% of the people drive to work as they are concerned about their comfort, while, 11% consider driving safer than cycling. It is noticeable that, 14% of the population, equally agree that driving is faster than cycling and believe it is ideal, as they need to carry some stuff to work. The number of people concerned about the distance they travel to work, at 21%, almost halved those who believes it is safer to drive than cycling. Generally, there is an insignificant difference about the number of people who choose cycling to be faster than driving at 12% and 14% respectively. Cyclist are not merely concerned about themselves, but they consider the environment, opposing drivers who worry about their safety only.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 560, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cycle'.
Suggestion: to cycle
...e about the number of people who choose cycling to be faster than driving at 12% and 14...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, hence, if, second, similarly, so, third, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 965.302439024 155% => OK
No of words: 301.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98671096346 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49010802217 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471760797342 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 283.868780488 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8633171192 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.461538462 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198486522979 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087224960973 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511845249107 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146389064883 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414405547828 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.