The bar graph illustrate the number of people as a percentage who lives, either in their own houses or as tenants in England and Wales for the years 1918 to 2011.
Overall, the number of people who were living in rented apartments was high in 1918 and remained stagnant between 1939 and 1953. Thereafter, it continued to decrease until 2001 and increase slightly in 2011. Home owners were very few at the beginning of the given period and similarly with those lived in as tenants remained constant from 1939 to 1953, continue increased as well upto 2001 and decrease in 2011. In 1971, there was an equal number of both tenants anf landlords in England and Wales.
It can be clearly seen that majority of people in England and Wales stayed in rented accomodation in 1971, as they were about 78 percent, whilst few people of an estimated 22 percent lived as landlords. The percentage of both home owners and tenants remained unchanged between these two countries in 1939 and 1953, as the occupants and householder took 68 percent and 32 percent respectively. The following years; in 1961, the number of residents continue to decline, while the house possessors movedup. In 1971, there was an equal 50 percent of both lodgers and homeowners.
Highlighted on the graph, from 1971 to 1981 there was a 10 percent upward and downward movement of people living in rented households and those in their own apartments respectively. A slight increase in number of home owners noted from 68 percent in 1991 to 69 percent in 2001. This trend is also similar to rented households which moved downwards from 22 percent in 1991 to 21 percent in 2001. The number of landlords decreased slightly from 69 percent in 2001 to 64 percent in 2011, similarly for those lived as tenants, there was an increase from 31 percent in 2001 to 35 percent in 2011.
To sum up, at the beginning of the given period few people lived in their own apartments, whereas the majority stayed as tenants. At the middle of this time frame, there was an equal number of both owners and tenants. Upon the end of the given years, there was a slight decrease in number of home owners and an increase of tenants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 1953, as the occupants and householder took 68 percent and 32 percent respectiv...
^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pectively. The following years; in 1961, the number of residents continue to decl...
^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the house possessors movedup. In 1971, there was an equal 50 percent of both lo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, well, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 33.7804878049 219% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 965.302439024 186% => OK
No of words: 381.0 196.424390244 194% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71391076115 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 3.73543355544 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50877175107 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.404199475066 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 283.868780488 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9966031354 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.099580184735 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041791879649 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435022571556 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076505136754 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511108755008 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.