The graph illustrates staffs who were undertaken to be taught as a part of university in both genders in 2012. All data are calculated by percentage.
Overall, it can be seen that women in 3 categories outweighed men. However, men tended to learn in 4 categories which were businesses, engineering, law and science. Furthermore, men were so enthusiastic about attending in engineering major. However, women being interested to take part of education more than any other majors.
First of all, about 55% of women was attending in arts and also men were approximately 43% which less than women. On the other hand, business major attracted men more than women by about 50% differences. However, almost two third of academic members keened on being taught education. The rest of them which was men about a quarter.
Moving onto engineering, its category hit the maximum staffs including men (83%). But for women was just also 15%. Turning next to law, about less than one third of staffs was made from men and women took part approximately 40%. The situation for medicine members was dissimilar from any other categories. Both men and women seem undertook somehow equally. Finally, the number of men academic staffs was about two fold more than women in science.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, third, thus, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02857142857 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74974333991 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6725429374 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.0 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.125 22.9334400587 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0950151780954 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363348866906 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491500695772 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075464643516 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508495655253 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.