the graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012
The bar chart illustrates the rate of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012. Overall, during 2012 frame, engineering department was a notable major to male, this trend being the highest figure, whilst, education was a major least male study in. In contrast, education extremely attracted with female, and engineering still rarely girls.
To begin with, we can see art was a department which was attended by a large of members, with female about nearly 60% and male about 44%. On the other hand, in business, the number of male learned at this major about 64% double compare with female. Moreover, education was a hot department in this period to female, this trend being the first position (76%), whereas, the number of students joined education in male just one thirds female. Meanwhile, engineering had plenty of male who embarked in, measuring about 84% that higher than the amount of female one fifths. Addition, law had female who joined more than male about 20%, with male(60%) and female(40%). To be continue, student searched in medicine major seem equal, about (49%-50%). Finally, with science are researched by male more than female a half of faculty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one fifth', 'a fifth', or simply 'fifths'?
Suggestion: one fifth; a fifth; fifths
...% that higher than the amount of female one fifths. Addition, law had female who joined mo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, still, third, whereas, while, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02487562189 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47273191204 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587064676617 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4943657501 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253225880966 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119988225765 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16211435007 0.0843802449381 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244249340182 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124210846499 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.