The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso

The following pie charts compare percent of British students able to speak other languages with the addition of their native language. Studies were carried out at one university in England in two separate years.

It is apparent that percent of British students increased over the period who able to speak in various languages except French language only. A much larger portion of British students loved to speak in Spanish language only whereas few students loss their interest in learning French language.

According to chart, 20% people unable to speak in any language in 2000 while the ratio reduced by half in 2010 and only 10% pupils accounted as able to speak English only. In 2010, particularly 10% people knew how to talk in French language which is 5% less in comparison with 2000. There was no change in portion of British students who able to speak German language only. The figure remained at 10% in both mentioned year.

On the other hand, Spanish language was most favorite among British university students and peaked at 35% in 2010 which is 5% more than 2000. 10% and 15% students able to make their speech in two other languages and another language respectively in 2000. A sharp rose in 2010 in both sectors consequently 5% more students capable to speak.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...h the addition of their native language.The survey carried out at an university in ...
^^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...tive language.The survey carried out at an university in England in two separate y...
^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...itish student increased over the period who able to speak in various languages except Fr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ak in Spanish language only whereas few students loss their interest in learning French ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...no change in portion of British student who able to speak German language only which rem...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntly 5% more students capable to speak.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, so, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 937.175257732 113% => OK
No of words: 215.0 206.0 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91627906977 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45121133176 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 127.690721649 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539534883721 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 290.88556701 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.011716605 44.8134815571 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.125 76.5299724578 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 16.8248392259 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 4.34317383033 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 2.54639175258 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363833697579 0.216113520407 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177858309884 0.0766984524023 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521303953072 0.0603063233224 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236973938199 0.12726935374 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332960694628 0.0580467560999 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 8.37731958763 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 70.7449484536 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...h the addition of their native language.The survey carried out at an university in ...
^^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...tive language.The survey carried out at an university in England in two separate y...
^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...itish student increased over the period who able to speak in various languages except Fr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ak in Spanish language only whereas few students loss their interest in learning French ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...no change in portion of British student who able to speak German language only which rem...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntly 5% more students capable to speak.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, so, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 937.175257732 113% => OK
No of words: 215.0 206.0 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91627906977 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45121133176 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 127.690721649 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539534883721 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 290.88556701 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.011716605 44.8134815571 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.125 76.5299724578 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 16.8248392259 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 4.34317383033 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 2.54639175258 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363833697579 0.216113520407 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177858309884 0.0766984524023 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521303953072 0.0603063233224 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236973938199 0.12726935374 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332960694628 0.0580467560999 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 8.37731958763 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 70.7449484536 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.