The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK.
The table illustrates how much money can be earned and used for food and clothes of an average family in a UK city.
Generally, the total income of an average British family decreased between 2010 and 2013, while the amount of money spent on food and clothing increased. Additionally, the resident here paid much more money on food than clothes in both years.
As can be seen from the table, in 2010, people with average living standards in England made 29,000$, and nearly half of them were applied in food and clothes. Over the next three years, the average income of a family in Britain fell to about 25,000$. Meanwhile, there was a growth of 1,000$ in the expenditure on food and clothes.
Regarding the pie charts, the percentage of spending on meat and fish was highest among all categories in 2010, at 29%, but three years later experienced a drop to 23%. Similarly, the rate of money using for clothes also went down from 15% to 13%. On the other hand, it seems that people expended more money on fruit, vegetables, and dairy products as the figures rose to 30% and 16%, respectively. Meanwhile, the proportion of spending on other food remained unchanged at exactly 18%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...age living standards in England made 29,000$, and nearly half of them were applied i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...of a family in Britain fell to about 25,000$. Meanwhile, there was a growth of 1,000...
^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...00$. Meanwhile, there was a growth of 1,000$ in the expenditure on food and clothes....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, regarding, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71497584541 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49307191916 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599033816425 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9229151131 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303619090731 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114532403261 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980428277856 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194835468595 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805054043117 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.