The bar chart depicts a comparison of different travel modes for children commuting from home to school in the year of 1990 and 2010. There are five types of transportation, car passenger, walking, cycling, walking and bus, and bus. Overall, the most popular means of transport in 1990 is walking, but it was replaced by car later in 2010. Except travelling by car, all forms of transport have experienced a considerable decline during these two decades.
Firstly, in 1990, a significantly large number of students chose to walk between home and school (more than 12 million trips annually), while the amount of cycling, walking combined bus was as half as the walking figure. Buses were the second popular travelling tool among pupils ( 7 million trips per year), whereas cars were the least chosen ones (only 4 million trips were made in one year).
Later, in 2010, cars dramatically became the most preferred transport, which was used 11 million times annually, whilst cycling dropped to the bottom, with poorly 2 million times trips made in a year. Further it can be inferred that, other modes of travel also saw falls. Walking and walking combined bus had halved in number of trips(6 million and 3 million trips per year respectively), and bus showed a slightly decreased number(5 million trips in 2010).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ond popular travelling tool among pupils 7 million trips per year, whereas cars w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95890410959 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5799369619 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9091217893 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228484182014 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100019970233 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846574278694 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158625112158 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392878903652 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.