The graph gives information about how much American and Britain drivers spent on petrol, dividing them for the different levels of income.
For what concerns the category of the poorest, it is possible to notice that they followed a positive upward trend spending almost the 3% of their income on petrol, while in the USA, although at the beginning they were increasing reaching a pick of more than 5%, then instead they started to decrease the consume keeping a downward tendency all over the 2 categories left: middle-income and richest.
In fact, for the first category the fall reached a percentage of almost 4 that dramatically and constantly continued to decrease until the second category of the richest that spent on petrol less than 3%.
Whereas UK, interweaved with USA for the middle-income reaching the same percentage (4)in the consume of petrol and then remained constant until a final small drop not very significant for the richest drivers.
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its life cycle.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 68
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old, while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight.How far do you agree with either of these views? 80
- The Table below shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006. 83
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Percentage of national consumer expenditure by category - 2002. 70
- Students should pay the full cost of university studies,rather than have free higher education provided by the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 43
Sentence: Whereas UK, interweaved with USA for the middle-income reaching the same percentage 4in the consume of petrol and then remained constant until a final small drop not very significant for the richest drivers.
Error: interweaved Suggestion: interleaved ?
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 39.5 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 158 200
No. of Characters: 779 1000
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.545 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.93 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.733 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 59 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 47 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 33 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 39.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.183 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.584 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.138 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4