The graph shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The given line chart details the statistical information on the quantity of the commodities(in million tonnes) transported in the UK via four different channels over a period of 28 years from 1994 to 2002.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the majority of the import was done using roads, while the least was recorded through the pipeline system.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, nearly 70 million tonnes of goods were moved by the road system compared to just 5 million tonnes using pipelines. Also, whereas roads witnessed a slight decline of about 10 million tonnes in 1982, the pipeline business rose three-fold in the same period. After that, despite a few fluctuations, the road business dramatically climbed to a peak value of 100 million tonnes, at the same time, the pipeline business grew steadily before getting leveled off in 1984 at one-fifth of the road business for three consecutive years in a row.
On the other hand, both waterways and rail started at the same value of 40 million tonnes in 1974. Whilst the former experienced a surge followed by a stable behavior at 60 million tonnes until 1994, the latter with a reverse trend slacked off by nearly 10 million tonnes. However, by the end, both observed an upward trend with the former at 65 million tonnes, up by nearly 20 million tonnes than the latter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 10 million tonnes. However, by the end, both observed an upward trend with the f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94017094017 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61827391938 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594017094017 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.9360528576 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.5 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.073094810137 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385824668239 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787600806418 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672030384554 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102007238154 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.