rewarding in business
The reading passage is about how devising a precise and well-structured system of
rewarding improves productivity in a business. According to the reading, this
reward can be in form of money, financial assistance, or job-related privileges.
However, the professor points out some drawbacks of such tact and casts doubt on
the points made by the passage.
For the beginning, the professor explains that a rewarding system may result in
counter-productivity, instead of boosting efficacy. He suggests that a reward will be
perceived as a punishment, and the workers may feel as they are being controlled and
manipulated. The more the reward is greater, the more the disappointment from not
achieving it will be. Taking into account that most of the workers are not going to win
the reward, leaves us with the fact that in long term the workforce will be significantly
unsatisfied, and will feel like being punished. This is contrary to the passage that claims
the bigger the reward is, the higher the productivity will be.
Moreover, the professor explicitly highlights that the rewarding system will jeopardize
the collaborative works. He gives an example of an employee, who may not inform his
supervisor of an error, which he has made, in order to secure the possibility of winning
the reward for good performance. This undermines the premise of the passage that
believes the motivation provided by such incentives improves the attitudes of the
employees.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31779661017 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19066108443 2.5805825403 124% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1396745112 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.090909091 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.09492273731 440% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206882088042 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090464765383 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463577330726 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728532339422 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733191531678 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.