rewarding system in companies
Both lecture and passage discuss rewarding system in business places. The passage states that this approach, getting rewards to employees in tied of their performance, increase the employees' motivation to work harder and the productivity in any company. In the opposite, the professor denies this passage's claim by giving some information.
To begin with, the professor refer to the feedback results of workers who experience the reward system. He says that these worker showed disapproval toward this system because they know after rewards more working is expected by managers. Furthermore, the professor states that it is true there are many no controlled studies showing more productivity in some companies through rewarding system, but in fact there are many studies showing opposite of this, decreasing productivity by applying such rewarding system.
The professor mention that such rewords means like punishment by employee. In fact the process of compensating their productivity with rewards make them to feel manipulating with their managers. Most of time, the worker don’t receive their expecting rewards, so they will be disappointed by this.
The professor also claims that rewarding system is likely to damage collaborating between workers and their supervisor. The workers will not be comfortable with their supervisor because they are those persons who will judge and calculate the workers performance. Hence, they will not talk about their problems with their supervisor and this lead to declining the productivity of workers and companies.
In conclusion, even though the reading state that rewarding system is an effective approach to improve productivity in companies, but the professor disagrees with this opinion and states an opposite result of this approach, decreasing productivity in companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-07 | nargess1981 | 76 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 83 | view |
- One of the controversial issues related to professors is that whether or not they must allow students to use the internet connected devices in classes 73
- adopting new stricter regulation for handing and storing coal ash 80
- young people in such a sophisticated atmosphere have to be able to plan and organize 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If you do not make sure other people (especially influential people or your employers) know about your strengths and accomplishments, you will never get successful in life. 73
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with them?(The Explanation type, generally one side of the issue is discussed) 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...tied of their performance, increase the employees motivation to work harder and the produ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun no seems to be countable; consider using: 'many noes', 'many nos'.
Suggestion: many noes; many nos
...fessor states that it is true there are many no controlled studies showing more product...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: NOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...r states that it is true there are many no controlled studies showing more product...
^^
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...ersons who will judge and calculate the workers performance. Hence, they will not talk ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, so, in conclusion, in fact, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65818181818 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90746318098 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523636363636 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5490103697 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28221476181 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114786642868 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114876850104 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160738333941 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126237517239 0.0443174109184 285% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.