Writing task 1: Maps
The maps below demonstrate the changes in Nelson’s city between the year 2000 and today. Generally, it is clear that the city has recently experienced significant modernization due to various changes in facilities and transportation.
During the development of Nelson, the university building is seen to be the only place that remains unchanged amid urbanization. There is a new tramline that has been made besides the new train station, assisted to connect the university and the city center together. Furthermore, on the north-western corner, next to the tertiary, an empty space in 2000 has now become a hall of residence. Besides, it is also noted that there is a change in the transformation of Nelson's shopping trend, with the proof being the replacement of an old market with a new shop on the west side, a completely new covered market on the other side, and the construction of a new shopping center on the green area.
On the other hand, if we look forward to the lower part, the port area, which used to be deserted, has now become more energetic with the current open-range of entertainment facilities such as the restaurant (on the South-West), bar and clubs (on the South-East). And the road has been pedestrianized only. Finally, one more other interesting is that a bike rental scheme has been offered by the city centre.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, furthermore, if, look, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96888888889 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18328970302 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.918213535 43.030603864 265% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 139.75 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0205770924584 0.215688989381 10% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0129644389166 0.103423049105 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343006812609 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0211058905344 0.15604864568 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298482366398 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.