23.7.2022: Many people find it hard to balance their work with other parts of their lives. What are the reasons for this? How this problem can be overcome?
In the integration and development society, people cope with many problems in their lives, especially separating their work from other aspects of their lives. To the best of my knowledge, there are various reasons behind this phenomenon, and several solutions should be applied.
There are two main reasons for this tendency. First of all, people are too appreciative of materialism, they consider money more important than other factors like health, and relationships. As a result, they forget other aspects of existence to increase their income. Moreover, in the developed society's era, one key is growing demands in the workplace to satisfy all human needs. To be more specific, employees are more likely to assume a heavy workload, leading to the fact that they have to work overtime to be able to accomplish their assigned duties. For instance, most workers spend over 10 hours per day finishing their tasks at the workplace but the quality is not good and their income is still low than in the fact.
In my view, there are several ways to overcome this issue starting with spending less money could mean fewer hours working and more time for a rewarding life. Because various kinds of research show that once our basic needs are met, a higher income does not necessarily lead to happiness. Furthermore, companies should reduce work time and pay an average salary that helps personnel live normally without the need to perform extra time. They can go back home, and enjoy their private life which motivates them to work.
In conclusion, activity is a crucial part of a person's life, causing some personages to have to believe that it's the only part that matters. However, many solutions can be obtained to overcome such a drawback and have a balanced life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...lusion, activity is a crucial part of a persons life, causing some personages to have t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...some personages to have to believe that its the only part that matters. However, ma...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96283783784 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54819997985 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2551188101 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.928571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356292735921 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105611680345 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741327405435 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200749261268 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749044324111 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.