The bar graph compares the amount of coffee and meat consumed each year by Norway, France, Germany, USA, Russia, China and Japan.
The bar graphs elucidate the amount of coffee and meat consumption in seven countries.
It is evident from the graph; the coffee was the least popular among seven countries whereas the meat was the most popular among Western countries (USA, France, Norway and Germany).
The amount of 122 kg of meat was consumed by USA citizens as the most significant compared to other countries. European countries showed the next highest meat consumption in kilograms, with outstanding data from German people ate 87 kg of meats, followed by French of 72 kg and 60 kg per Norman person. Meat consumption in Russia and China recorded similar amount of 45 and 47 kg, respectively. The lowest meat consumption was Japanese as they consumed almost a third of those of Americans.
In contrast, Norman showed the outstanding coffee intake of 9 kg and German followed closely of 7 kg per person. About 5 kg per person, 4 kg per person and 5 kg per person of meat has consumed by French, American and Russian, respectively. Chinese drank the lowest amount of coffee of 2 kg per Chinese people as observed from the graph.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
Sun, 06/17/2018 - 02:08 | Madhu081191aluri | 56 | view |
- The Bar graph bellow shows the Expenditure in Million Pounds on fast food items by income groups in UK 47
- The graph below shows the total value of exports and the value of fuel food and manufactured goods exported by one country from 2000 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U S from 1960 to 2011 75
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011. 87
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
wrong:
was the most popular/significant
correct:
was the most popular/significant thing (people, products...)
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 190 200
No. of Characters: 886 1000
No. of Different Words: 92 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.713 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.663 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.626 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 73 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 42 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 30 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.279 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.483 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.712 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.172 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4