You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.

These two pie charts demonstrate of Japan and Malaysia’s household expenditures on different categories such as housing, transport, food, health care and other goods and services for 2010. In overall, Japanese household has spent the most on other goods and services whereas in Malaysian’s household has spent on housing during the same period.

The great portion in Malaysia is for housing, which contributes of 34% of total country’s expenditure whereas in Japan’s housing expenditure is worth 21% of total country’s spending. Japan’s biggest expenditure is on other goods and services, which proportioned of 29% of total country’s spending. In comparison, the proportion of other goods and services in Malaysia have distributed only 26% of total household’s expenditure.

The transportation expenditure in Malaysia is only one in tenth of their expenditure, which figure is doubled in Japan. The lowest categories for both countries are for health care, which has recorded as 3% and 6% in Malaysia and Japan respectively

Votes
Average: 8 (2 votes)

Comments

demonstrate of Japan and Malaysia’s household expenditures
demonstrate Japan and Malaysia’s household expenditures

whereas in Malaysian’s household has spent on housing
whereas Malaysian’s household has spent on housing

whereas in Japan’s housing expenditure is worth 21%
whereas Japan’s housing expenditure is worth 21%

The transportation expenditure in Malaysia is only one in tenth of their expenditure, which figure is doubled in Japan.
The transportation expenditure in Malaysia is only one in tenth of their expenditure, while figure is doubled in Japan.

flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 158 200
No. of Characters: 843 1000
No. of Different Words: 78 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.545 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.335 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.068 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 60 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 53 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 41 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.571 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.17 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.537 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.752 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.235 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4