The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the average expenditures of living in Malaysia and Japan in 2010. There are some differences in the major categories of household expenses in these two countries.
On the one hand, the information on Japan pie chart shows that this country has various categories involving in living costs. The most expenditure belongs to goods and services with a proportion of 29%; also, the food category with a portion of 24% is the second group of living costs. However, the lowest amount of household expenses belongs to healthcare group with the proportion of only 6%.
On the other hand, the pie chart of Malaysia indicates that most of the living costs in this country are because of hosing. In fact, the proportion of 34% of expenditures belongs to housing while 27% is for food and 26% is for goods and other services. It should be noted that healthcare costs have the lowest amount of expenses among all other categories.
In general, the information of average household costs of Malaysia and Japan determine that although housing includes the most part of expenditures, services and goods play a significant role in household expenses od Japan. Furthermore, healthcare has the lowest amount of cost in both countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, second, so, while, in fact, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08737864078 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80427948149 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461165048544 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3777166269 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203096472436 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936679516113 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108213253618 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147098988522 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723220807078 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.